Disparity and Structural Transformation Across Districts in Kalimantan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v6i03.111Keywords:
Growth, Inequality, Williamson Index, Theil Entropy Index, Kutnez HypothesisAbstract
The purpose of this paper to determine the uneven development across districts in Kalimantan and also to examines whether Kutnez hypothesis is applicable in Kalimantan. Klassen Typology, Williamson Index dan Entropy Theil Index, Structural Transformation, also Ratio Gini are employed in order to analysis the inequality of 56 districts in Kalimantan during 2010-2016. The result of study shows that: (1) the majority of regions on the island of Kalimantan belong to developed regions; (2) Kutnez hypothesis is applicable in Kalimantan; (3) regional inequality in Kalimantan shows an decline trend for the period of observation; (4) East Kalimantan province gives the largest contribution towards the inequality in Kalimantan; and (5) the highest structural transformation have been in Kutai Kartanegara District.
Downloads
References
Ayelazuno, J.A. 2013. Neoliberalism and Growth Without Development in Ghana: A Case for State-Ied Industrialization. Journal of Asian and African Studies 2014 49:80, 3 May 2013.
Bappenas. 2010. Kajian Strategis Aktivitas Ruang Antara Kawasan Strategis Nasional Dengan Daerah Tertinggal di Pulau Kalimantan. Tersedia di http://www.kawasan.bappenas.go.id/, images, diakses pada 02 Desember 2014.
Bonet, J. Ann, R.S. 2006. Fiscal Decentralization And Regional Income Disparities: Evidence From The Colombian Experience. The Annals of Regional Science Volume 40, Issue 3: 661-676, August 2006.
BPS. 2016. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi-Provinsi di Indonesia Menurut Lapangan Usaha 2010-2016. BPS. Jakarta.
BPS. 2016. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Per Kapita Provinsi-Provinsi di Indonesia 2010-2016. BPS. Jakarta.
Cingano, F. 2014. Trends In Income Inequality And Its Impact On Economic Growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 163.
Christina, M. 2015. Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Ketimpangan di Kalimantan. Tesis tidak diterbitkan, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Chrisyanto, C. 2006. Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketimpangan Perekonomian Antardaerah di Indonesia”. Program Studi Perencanaan dan Kebijakan PublikFakultas EkonomiUniversitas Indonesia. Tersedia di http://www.lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20308322-T%2031693, diakses pada 16 Juli 2014.
Dhyatmika, K.W. 2013. Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Provinsi Banten Pasca Pemekaran. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Tersedia di http://eprints.undip.ac.id/38984/1/ DHYATMIKA.pdf diakses pada 25 Agustus 2014.
Easterly, W. 2001. The Political Economy of Growth Without Development: A Case Study of Pakistan. Development Research Group, World Bank, June 2001.
Kuncoro, M. 2002. Analisis Spasial dan Regional: Studi Aglomerasi dan Kluster Industri Indonesia. UPP-AMP YKPN. Yogyakarta.
Kuncoro, M. 2004. Otonomi Dan Pembangunan Daerah: Reformasi Perencanaan, Strategi, dan Peluang. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Kuncoro, M. Idris, A.N. 2010. Mengapa Terjadi Growth Without Development Di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi PembangunanVolume 11, No. 2, Desember 2010, halaman 172-190.
Kuncoro, M. 2013. Can MP3EI Reduce Inter-Regional Inequality?. South East Asian Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics, and Law.
Kuncoro, M. Christina, M. 2016. Membangun Kalimantan: Potensi Ekonomi Daerah, Pusat Pertumbuhan, Dan Strategi. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Ncube, et al., 2014. Inequality, Economic Growth and Poverty in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). African Development Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2014, 435–453.
Ogunleye, E.K. 2011. Structural Transformation In Sub-Saharan Africa: The Regional Growth Poles Strategy. African Economic Conference, Kigali.
Rochana, S. H. 2012. Kesenjangan Ekonomi Antar Wilayah Pada Era Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia. Tersedia di http://sappk.itb.ac.id/spe/wpcontent/uploads/2013/11/otonomi daerah- sayembara.pdf, diakses pada 15 September 2014.
Santosa, S.H. 2015. Disparitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah Di Satuan Wilayah Pembangunan IV Provinsi Jawa Timur. Media Trend Vol. 10 No.2 Oktober 2015, hal. 116-128.
Sitorus, D.Y.R. 2012. Analisis Pertumbuhan dan Ketimpangan AntarKabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Tahun 2001-2009. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Tersedia di http://www.eprints.undip.ac.id/35998/1/SITORUS.pdf, diakses pada 13 Agustus 2014.
Soetopo, R.W.S. 2009. Analisis Ketimpangan Pendapatan Antarpulau di Indonesia. Tersedia di http://www.repository.ip.ac.id/handle/123456789/ 14371.html, diakses pada 10 Juli 2014.
Yang, Y. Angang, H. 2008. Investigating Regional Disparities of China’s Human Development with Cluster Analysis. A Historical Perspektive. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 86 No. 3 (pp. 417-432). Springer
Todaro, M. Smith, S. C. 2003. Economic Development, Eight Edition. Pearson Education Limited, United Kingdom.
Todaro, M. Smith, S.C. 2006. Economic Development, Edisi Kesembilan, Jilid 1. (Drs. Haris Munandar, M.A.; Puji A.L., S.E, Trans). Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. (Pearson Education Limited, United Kingdom diterbitkan tahun 2006).
Williamson, J.G. 1965. Regional Inequality and The Process of Nation Development: A Description of The Pattern (versi elektronik). Journal of Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol 13. No.4, Part 2 (Juli, 1965). pp.1-84.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shell be assigned to Development Innovation: Jurnal Kelitbangan (JIP) , Balitbangda Provinsi Lampung as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations, the reproduction of any part of this journal, its storeage in databases and its transmission by any form or media. such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc.